Showing posts with label Does It Work?. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Does It Work?. Show all posts

Does It Work: "Anti-Stink" Clothing

>> Wednesday, June 30, 2010

This past spring, I got to try out shirt made by New Balance (the "NBx Emmisive" long-sleeve) that had "X-Static" fiber woven into it. Click here to see a very similar version of that shirt. Here's a bit from the X-Static website that talks about what it can do:

X-static is a fiber made with layer of 99.9% pure silver, which is permanently bonded to the surface of a textile fiber. It has been used primarily as an industrial and medical product, servicing high-tech industries and the Department of Defense.

More recently it has been thrust into consumer product markets as a result of the need for a safe, natural and effective antimicrobial solution. X-static is a fiber antimicrobial, all natural, heat transfer, anti-static and therapeutic.

Antimicrobial. Eliminates odor causing bacteria and athlete’s foot fungus.

Anti-odor. Inhibits growth of bacteria and fungi and neutralizes ammonia and denatured proteins.

All- Natural. 100%. Safe and non-toxic, containing no chemical or pesticides.

Thermodynamic. Regulates temperature: cooler in the summer, warmer in the winter. Thanks to heat conductive body heat is distribuited and conducted to the outside air and thanks to heat reflective body heat is reflected back to the skin.

Anti-static. It has very high electrical conductivity.

So I don't know about you, but I read that as "this shirt won't start to smell like anus." OK. Lemme try.

Here I am wearing it as I set my current 5K PR (17:11) this spring:


Pre-race (with a cat coming out of my butt)


Near the finish line

Then I wore it a few weeks later when I set my half marathon PR (1:22:51) racing with friends in WI:


2 miles left... mustering a smile


Just after finishing. And yes, that's salt on my cheek to the right.
I look like hell, but the shirt looks nice.

Bottom line: it never got funky. Yes, my pits stunk after that half marathon, but shortly after taking off the shirt, it was only ME that still smelled. NOT the shirt. More importantly, it's comfy as hell and I like the way it "falls" on me. Pharmie thinks it's cozy. And if it can hold up for a half-marathon, it's alright in my book.

Side Note: I have a friend who's been falling in love with some "anti-stink" technology from a different brand (I don't think it's New Balance, but I can't remember). He's being a "guy" about it and seeing how long he can go without washing it. He made me sniff it a few months ago. (OK, so he didn't have to MAKE me.) He claimed he's worn it for 40-50 runs, and it just smelled like fabric. It didn't smell like pits, or swass, or chode. That makes me think that this "technology" is the real deal (albeit allowing guys to be gross).

New Balance Emmisive ("Anti-Stink") Shirt: Grade of A. It's a great running shirt, and it doesn't hold an odor. It's pretty thin, so it's a good spring / fall shirt, but it's way too thin to be worn during the winter. However, I suppose it'd work well as a base-layer during the coldest months.

p.s. I feel like any "name brand" promoting some sort of "anti-stink" clothing would work similarly. I'd just stay away from off-brands like Ree-bonk and Nigh-Kee. ;) Again, click here to be taken to OnlineShoes.com to see more about this New Balance NBx Emmisive shirt and / or to purchase it.

p.p.s. The term "anti-stink" is not an industry term. That's just a "Steve" term. Much like "bootylicious" before Beyonce stole it...

p.p.p.s. Giveaway news tomorrow! So stop back if you like food hearty food!! (Update [10:35 am] - the giveaway might be post-poned. I'll have more soon...)

(Click on the “Does It Work” tag to see all posts in this mini-series. I did a number of posts like this back in February.)

Read more...

Does It Work: CarboPro

>> Tuesday, June 29, 2010

Rachel tweeted me yesterday with a request: “@steveinaspeedo a post request: maybe you and pharmie could give your two cents about why you use carbo pro instead of heed or other stuff?” GREAT idea! Here it is.

Pharmie heard about Carbo-Pro as she was training for her first Ironman back in 2006. Therefore, I started using it when we trained for IM together in 2007. Carbo-Pro is a flavorless powder that you add to any beverage to add calories for long workouts. And that’s exactly why we like it. We usually make it with a little diluted Gatorade so it has a little flavor, but it’s not overwhelming.

Here are 2 photos from our first 100-mile bike ride in early August, 2006. We made some Carbo-Pro so strong that we used a blender to help get it thoroughly mixed. FYI: besides this time, we’ve NEVER had to use a blender. But being we were hoping to get about 1200 calories / water bottle, we grabbed a blender to help get everything mixed well:


1200 calories of Carbo-Pro waiting to be blended


Pharmie holding 2400 calories for our ride

Last April, Carbo-Pro made another appearance on my blog in my Ironman New Orleans 70.3 race report. The first image in that post is Pharmie getting some Carbo-Pro ready for the race and then shaking it in her bottle to mix it:



Nutrition is a VERY personal choice, and Carbo-Pro has worked for me for years.

I’ve tried Accelerade: can you say “cottonmouth?”
I’ve tried Heed: not enough calories for long distance training.
I’ve tried Perpetuem: it made my stomach upset 70 miles into a ride.

(For the record, I don’t really know if it was Perpetuem’s fault that my stomach was upset. But you all know that if you try a new product and that hampers your ride, you’ll most likely never use that product again. So I haven’t touched Perpetuem in nearly 3 years.)

Those photos above of 1200 calories in a water bottle are a little extreme. Usually, if I’m just going out for a 40+ miler, I’ll just throw in a few scoops to add a few hundred calories. Here’s a photo from IM WI 2007, and the water bottle on my seat tube (partially behind my foot) contained my Carbo-Pro mix:



Carbo-Pro: Grade of A / A+. It’s flavorless. It dissolves easily. It’s not syrupy (unless you’re making 16 oz of liquid into over 1000 calories, then it does start to get a little syrupy). It just adds calories to whatever you mix it with. How can you go wrong?

Click here to learn more about Carbo-Pro. That link is to a Canaidan site, so you can order through them if you live in Canada. Otherwise just Google it, and you’ll see you can order it from a number of different online retailers. There’s only 1 store in the Minneapolis / St. Paul metro area (that we’ve found) that carries Carbo-Pro.

(Click on the “Does It Work” tag to see all posts in this mini-series. I did a number of posts like this back in February.)

Read more...

Does It Work: The RumbleRoller

>> Monday, June 28, 2010

It looks like a foam roller on roids.



Here’s what their website says about how it’s supposed to work:

The surface of the RumbleRoller contains 200 specially designed "bumps". The bumps are firm, but flexible, much like the thumbs of a massage therapist.

As you roll over the top of the RumbleRoller, the bumps continuously knead the contours of your body, gently stretching soft tissue (muscle and fascia) in multiple directions. This action erodes trigger points, helps restore flexibility, and brings quick relief to common types of muscular pain. By design, the RumbleRoller's bumps are firmer than muscle tissue, but much softer than bone, so they deflect out of the way if they contact your spine or other bony protrusions.

Through simple techniques, you can control the amount of pressure the bumps apply to your body. The bumps are closely spaced to one another (< 2" apart), so several of them simultaneously contact your body during most exercises. However, with a slight shift of your body, you can reduce your area of contact with the RumbleRoller, which increases pressure and provides deeper, more penetrating relief.

Here’s a photo of my foam roller next to my RumbleRoller for comparison:



But does it work as they claim? And is it work the nearly $70 retail price? My answer: I think it works. The bumps have a little give to them, but they’re actually pretty hard. They work like a mini-massage to rub out sore, tight, pissed-off areas of your body. I was able to use the RumbleRoller on all the “usual spots” where I use a foam roller: IT band, calves, hammys, quads.

When I foam roll, I never feel like I can roll through my hamstrings enough - I don’t have enough body weight to put enough force on my hammys. But being the RumbleRoller is more “aggressive,” it works better through my hammys:


I DON’T always roll in my khakis, but I DO always roll with my cats

And on a hilarious / awkward note, I really enjoyed this image that came in the pamphlet that showed different ways to use the Rumble Roller. I can honestly say that I've never used a roller quite like THIS before:


I gotta try that. I think.

RumbleRoller for Beginners: Grade of C-. Yeah, it’s going to help work out those sore spots. But I don’t think you should START with a RumbleRoller. Start with a foam roller - either purchase one or get to be good friends with one at your gym. (Click here to go to my “Does it Work” post about Foam Rollers.) Here’s an analogy that I think fits in this situation: You need to own a pair of regular running shoes before you get a pair of racing flats. A foam roller is like the running shoes, and the RumbleRoller is like the racing flats.

RumbleRoller for Foam Roller Users: Grade of B+ / A-. If you’re used to a foam roller and you feel like you could use “more” (something more aggressive; something “deeper”), then the RumbleRoller is what you’re after. Click here to go to their website.

(Click on the “Does It Work” tag to see all posts in this mini-series. I did a number of posts like this back in February.)

Back with another “Does It Work” post soon. And they’ll be a giveaway coming this week too!

Read more...

Does It Work: Roctane Gel

>> Saturday, February 06, 2010

Let’s cut to the chase. Here’s the real issue: “Regular” Gu is about $1.35 / packet, and Roctane Gu is about twice that ($2.50 / packet). Is it worth it?



I asked for some info from Gu, and they sent me a very official write-up with medical references. (There were 26 references for a 1.5 page write-up.) Here’s how it started:

Roctane is GU Sports’ new, high-performance energy gel that utilizes a similar formulation to our original GU Energy Gel, but with significantly higher concentrations of amino acids and citrates. Roctane also utilizes an amino acid complex – Ornithine Alpha-Ketaglutarate (OKG).

Roctane has been in use as a nutritional research tool with in-house and sponsored elite athletes over the past seven years to test new ideas for improving athletic performance and recovery. We have utilized third-party scientific studies and our own practical feedback from athletes in a variety of sports.

They go on to write about key ingredients in Roctane. Here’s my take on the “science-talk” that they have in there:

• Higher levels of Histidine (by 3 times) to encouraging the biosynthesis of buffering proteins, to help with muscle fatigue and metabolic acidosis.

• Higher levels of citrates (by 2.5 to 3 times) to basically give you more energy.

• Higher levels of branched chain amino acids (BCAAs - Leucine, Valine and Isoleucine [by 3 times]) to promote protein synthesis and it “may delay the onset of central fatigue by blocking the tryptophan transport into the brain, thus limiting the production of serotonin.” This basically fights off the feeling of fatigue and keeps you alert and focused.

• Amino acid complex that’s NOT in regular Gu. It blocks the body’s entrance into a destructive catabolic process.

And sorry if this part gets too boring, but it’s better to have too much information than too little (right?). Here are their closing comments on these thoughts above:

The benefits of these ingredient groups can be summarized as improved muscle buffering by mitigating the effects of lactic acid build up; more efficient energy production and better recovery through decreased exercise-induced muscle damage; and greater mental focus through delayed onset of central fatigue. These characteristics allow the athlete to perform at a higher intensity for a longer period of time.

Roctane does not contain the vitamin C or vitamin E that is in original GU in order to make room for the additional volume of ingredients in Roctane. Since it is fairly easy to obtain your daily recommended intake of vitamins C and E by ingesting one or more packets of original GU, we removed them in favor of accommodating the added OKG and other increased concentrations of ingredients which are beneficial on those really hard days. If you are concerned about getting enough antioxidants, we suggest including a packet of original GU in addition to Roctane as a part of your nutrition program during intense training and racing.

With the exception of OKG, the original GU formula contains each of the beneficial citrates and amino acids mentioned above. It is the increased concentrations of these ingredients, and thus the enhanced level and efficiency of their benefits, along with the addition of OKG, which sets Roctane apart as the maximum performance gel for serious endurance athletes.

OK, OK... but, DOES IT WORK?



I used Rotane during all my races after about the Apple Duathlon in May of last year. It’s expensive and (in my opinion) unnecessary to use during regular workouts. I still use regular Gu during longer rides or runs when I need some calories, but I save the Roctane for pre-race and during the race.

Roctane Gu: Grade of B+ / A-. I’m cheap, and Roctane is a little expensive. Roctane could move into an “A” or “A+” if it got cheaper (but didn’t sacrifice quality [yes, I know I’m demanding!]). But that being said, I’ll still ALWAYS grab a Roctane or 2 for a race and keep the regular Gu for routine workouts. I think it DOES work in the way that they describe it above. Really. I feel like I’ve had a increase in the time it takes for me to feel fatigued while racing this year. And BTW, the flavors are GREAT - I love the Blueberry Pomegranate.

Have you tried Roctane? Do you think it’s “better” than regular Gu? Click on the “Does It Work” tag to see all posts in this mini-series. Happy weekend!!

Reminder: BIG GIVEAWAY NEWS ON MONDAY!

Read more...

Does It Work: YakTrax Pro

I first started running with YakTrax about 2 years ago. They work well, but they work better in certain conditions. Here’s my current pair of YakTrax Pro (note that they are the “Pro” model that has the Velcro strap and not just the “Walker” model that has no strap):





These have helped me train over the last 3 winters for 3 winter half-marathons. I have another pair of more generic “spikes” that slip over my shoes, but I vastly prefer my YakTrax. But they’re not perfect for everything. Here are my thoughts.

YakTrax Pro for running on ice: Grade of B-. Nothing will make it “easy” to run on the ice. YakTrax help, but they don’t make it seem like your running on a grassy path in the middle of summer.

YakTrax Pro for running on uneven, packed sidewalks: Grade of B+. YakTrax work pretty good in these conditions - they work on clear, slightly icy, or packed sidewalks. If someone has shoveled down to bare cement, YakTrax are still fine on that, whereas some other “spikes” are really uncomfortable on clear sidewalks.

YakTrax Pro for running on EVEN packed snow: Grade of A. This is the BEST use for YakTrax! During most of my winter runs this year, I’ve been running along the Mississippi River on a trail that is maintained by the city. That trail NEVER has uneven footing. It always has just 1/4 inch of packed snow, and that’s PERFECT for YakTrax.

Have you tried YakTrax? How about any other sort of “traction spikes?” Click on the “Does It Work” tag to see all posts in this mini-series. Happy weekend!!

Reminder: BIG GIVEAWAY NEWS ON MONDAY!

Read more...

Friday Funny 75: Does It Work: Old School Running Shorts

>> Friday, February 05, 2010

March 30th, 2008. That was the first day I wore my short yellow shorts (AKA “Bowl Full of Sunshine) from my old high-school. I won the race and set my 5K PR of 17:27:



Was there any question as to WHY I was so fast? I just wore the shorty-shorts as a joke, but I found out they were QUITE comfortable to run in! Really!

I wore them for the Gear West Duathlon a few months after that where Matt and I (“Team Happy Pants”) took 2nd place:



And that summer, I tested them on a 13.1 mile run in Madison at WIBA. They held up GREAT for that run:



At the end of the season in 2008, “Team Happy Pants” was back to set a course record at the Cannon-Wells Duathlon:



And that fall, I won a 5K in the Bowl Full of Sunshine, and set my 3rd fastest 5K time ever:


Starting the second lap.

So last year, I wore them for similar races. Here they are at the 2009 Gear West Duathlon (where Matt and I got second AGAIN):


(We’ll be trying for first again this year)

And again at the 2009 Cannon-Wells Duathlon, where we took first once again:



And I debuted them in their longest race to date: the TC 10 Mile back in October:





When I put them on, I feel fast. It feels like everything’s saying “It’s time to RACE!” (It’s like that feeling I remember from high school when I put on my track spikes and felt how light they were.) I wore them at first as a joke, but they are really are comfortable! And they hold up fine over longer distances - there’s no rubbing or chaffing issues!

Old School Running Shorts: Grade of A. The only thing keeping them from being an “A+” is that once they get wet, they turn to cling-wrap:





Whoops. I’ll be keeping them dry from now on. Yes, officer, I promise.

Have you tried shorty-shorts running shorts? Did your family mock you, too? What are your thoughts? Click on the “Does It Work” tag to see all posts in this mini-series. Happy weekend!!

p.s. BIG GIVEAWAY NEWS ON MONDAY!

Read more...

Friday Funny 74: Does It Work: Enell Sports Bra

Well, I DIDN’T actually review this myself.

My wife has delicious C cups. Sometimes they’re up to D cups. (Those are good days.) But being the 11-time marathon finisher that she is (and 1-time ultra-marathoner), she has to deal with those ladies jumping all over the place.

She started by just wearing 2 sports bras. That was uncomfortable and a pain in the butt. (And hilarious.)

For quite some time now, she’s been getting the “Title Nine” catalog in the mail, and they have sports bras listed with a “dumbbell” rating system. The more dumbbells, the less bounce in the bra. They have a sports bra made by Enell that they called “The Last Resort Bra.” It truly is “the last resort” for women with ample chests because it’s quite ugly. But it’s the only sports bra that has a “5 dumbbell” rating.

Pharmie bought that bra HOPING for some support, and she’s never looked back. Here she is about to become an Ironman for the first time (in 2006), and you can see the tell-tale signs of the Enell sports bra by the upward-curving lines over each boob:



Here you can see her Enell sports bra in this lovely photo of us as she’s about to run the Twin Cities Marathon back in 2007:



You can see those same signs of the Enell sports bra during her first ultra marathon:



And most recently, you can see her wearing it as we climbed the Superstition Mountains in AZ last month:



To answer your question: NO, it’s NOT the SAME bra. Don’t be gross. Pharmie’s had like a dozen of them. But she SWEARS by them for running!

Pharmie and I were recently looking at the Enell website, and we stumbled across a good video. It's 2:12 long, and it's not "funny" for the first half. But then it gets good. Check out my play-by-play below the video.


Direct Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRRuaOdfuG4

- What's going on at 1:20 is my FAVORITE part when Pharmie puts on her bra. It's QUITE a show!
- It's fun to watch Pharmie "rearrange" everything too, as you can see in the video from 1:25 - 1:28.
- What's with the "Vanna White" hand motion at 1:35?!? I crack up every time! Are they serious?
- And then she's just jumping around from 1:38 - 1:50. That's the best way this video could possibly end.

We thought that was pretty good, but then we found this jem:


Direct Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGPp5YNJ9WI

Did they HAVE to choose that song?! And then from 0:35 - 1:03, I nearly lost it. ("It" can mean whatever you want it to...)

In conclusion, my wife LOVES her Enell sports bra, and I fully support her being “fully supported.”

Enell Sports Bra's Performance: Grade of A+. Quote from Pharmie: “Before I tried this sports bra, I used to get horrendous scabs in 'inconvenient' places from the chaffing no matter what type - or how many - sports bras I used. Now, with the Enell sports bra (and sometimes a little Body Glide) I rarely have a mark, even after a marathon. However, because it's so supportive, I can't wear it for all activities: I don't wear it during tris or while biking because it's too much pressure. If you need that much support during a tri, you can always order one size bigger so it's a little looser around your ribcage and offers more room to breath."

Enell Sports Bra's Comfort: Grade of A. Quote from Pharmie: “It takes a little getting used to breathing in this thing because it's a little tight around your ribcage. But wearing it is quite comfortable. The big shoulder straps and the crisscross in the back offer extra support during prolonged activity."

Enell Sports Bra's Appearance: Grade of C+. Quote from Pharmie: “There's no getting around it - it's pretty hideous. But I'd gladly give up looking like a super model in favor of making my boobs disappear and having a great workout!"

So check out Enell's website if you're an ample woman.

Do you have sports bra issues? Have you tried the Enell sports bra? And don't forget to check back at 2 am and 2 pm every day this week for more “Does It Work” posts. Click on the “Does It Work” tag to see all posts in this mini-series.

(I'll be back with 1 more "Friday Funny" version of "Does It Work" at 2 pm, and I think I'll have a few more "Does It Work" posts this weekend too.)

Read more...

Does It Work: Total Immersion Swim Training

>> Thursday, February 04, 2010

(Note: it’s been a few years since I’ve used Total Immersion [TI], so I might get some small details wrong. And I don’t have our TI kit in front of me as I’m writing this, so I might get some bigger details wrong. My apologies. God help me.)

Pharmie (my wife) got into triathlons in 2004. My attitude was always “Good for you, but you’ll never get me swimming like that. So I’ll cheer for you, but don’t try to push me into this.” She did an Olympic Distance tri in 04 and 05, and her sister and I cheered her along.

In December of 2005, she was going to “re-teach” herself how to swim. She bought a “Total Immersion” kit, which included a book, a DVD, and waterproof flashcards to take to the pool. With no pressure from my lovely wife, I said something like “You know, I think I’d be up for going through this program with you... and then trying a triathlon next summer...”

Pharmie read the book. We sat down and watched 1 section of the DVD each time before heading to the pool to work on that specific drill. (Each section of the DVD was only about 3-6 minutes long.) She would give me the theory behind that movement or drill from the book (I skimmed parts of the book, but never read it cover-to-cover).

Doing this with a partner was GREAT! In the pool, we could watch each other’s form and yank each other’s body around saying “...but it looked more like THIS in the DVD...”

We spent 15-40 minutes at the pool for each drill. There were around 15 drills (maybe 14, maybe 16, but close to 15). I did NOT rush it: if I was on drill 3, I’d do a quick lap of drill 1, another lap of drill 2, and then move on to the new movement. Sometimes, I’d spend 2 or 3 days at the pool working on 1 drill until it felt more natural. I REALLY took my time. I think Pharmie wanted to go faster, but I wanted to really “get” each step before moving on.

For newbies, it’s great because you don’t actually put your face into the water until around step 5. Before that, you’re on your back the entire time. And even for a few steps after that, your face goes in and out of the water, but you’re not face-down for long.

I got to the final drill, but I didn’t master that. It was how to breathe. Yeah, kinda a big one. So I did my first Oly, my first sprint, my first half IM, and my first full IM doing this: 3 strokes, quick breath, 4 strokes, roll to my back for 2 quick breaths, repeat. Swimming like that, I was SLOW, but it was easy. Here were my swim splits for 3 out of those 4 races:

- Oly, 2006: 42:25 (my first triathlon)
- Half IM, 2007: 44:35
- IM, 2007: 1:29:10

Notice in that half IM and full IM, that I had 1 pace: my full IM swim is EXACTLY double the time of my half IM swim! To the SECOND!

I mastered my breathing with the help of Andrea, the swim coach at the Y. I met with her twice, and she got me the rest of the way. Last year, my half IM swim at IM 70.3 NO was 37:53 (38:44 officially, once I got “stripped” and ran up the beach to the timing mat). And my 2 Olys were 28:07 and 29:38. So I’m still a pretty average swimmer, but I’m working on that speed.

I really couldn’t have started swimming without TI. You can’t just “figure out” swimming without some instruction. TI got me comfortable. It taught me to be smooth in the water. It taught me to “shoot” into the water better when I want to go faster, and that pulling and kicking harder will just tire me out.

Here’s a video of a BT member taking a TI class. (You can take a TI class that usually last 2-3 days and is usually around $500.) Here you can see a BIG change from day 1 to day 2, and even more improvement by day 3:


Direct link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shOM8BunXCM

You can see her stroke ease up, and she seems just so much more at ease on day 2. Faster? No. But more comfortable, for sure.

Total Immersion for someone just learning how to swim: Grade of A. You’ll get comfortable in the water. You won’t be freaking out. You’ll be slow, but with a little work, you’ll be able to go forever. Really. And as a beginner, the thought of just being able to go for a long time seems impossible.

Total Immersion for an “intermediate” swimmer: Grade of B-. It will be helpful to master some of the drills. You’ll be able to cruise through some of the first sets of drills. But (at least initially) it won’t make you faster. Smoother? Yes. More comfortable? Yes. But not necessarily faster.

Have you used Total Immersion? Has a close friend used it? What do you think? And don't forget to check back at 2 am and 2 pm every day this week for more “Does It Work” posts. Click on the “Does It Work” tag to see all posts in this mini-series.

BTW, tomorrow I'm doing my normal "Friday Funny" post, but I'm going to do 2 of them (at 2 am and 2 pm like I've been doing) that will still fit in the "Does It Work" week of posts. But they'll be lighter / funnier than most of these (but still very true). So check back!

Read more...

Does It Work: Beginner Triathlete, Buckeye Outdoors, Daily Mile, and Training Peaks

Note: Choosing an online workout log is a VERY personal choice. If I have bad things to say regarding your website of choice, it’s nothing personal against you. This whole process of finding an online log is really specific to one’s personality, and what works for me might not work for you, and vice versa. But here’s my 2 cents:

Back in August of last year, I put up a post asking for recommendations on different sites for tracking mileage. I had a "physical" day-planner that I had been using as a log, but wanted to try something new. I noted that I had a Wellsphere account, but didn’t like that for tracking miles. If I had to give Wellsphere a grade, it’d be this:

Wellsphere: Grade of F+. This may have changed since I deleted my account, but I had to round every workout to the nearest mile! REALLY?!? This site was horrible, and the layout made it really difficult to get around. Sucktastic.

Oh, and I DID consider just tracking everything in a spreadsheet file on my own computer. Some bloggers sent me some VERY COOL spreadsheets files all set up by day, month, and year. Everything was totaled up automatically, pie charts would appear at the bottom, etc, etc. They were pretty sweet. But I decided I wanted to work online. Plus, I was afraid that the file could suddenly go corrupt and I’d lose all my training info. (I guess I have more faith in unknown online companies to not lose my data...*gulp*)

Personal Spreadsheet: Grade of ??. You could make this as simple or as complex as you’d like, so it’s tough to give this a letter grade.

So in that post back in August, people were recommending some great sites. I listened to what people were saying, and in September of last year, I started 4 new accounts with Beginner Triathlete, Buckeye Outdoors, Daily Mile, and Training Peaks. I started tracking my workouts, mileage, and races with those sites. I QUICKLY found ones to work better for me than others.

Here’s my review of all 4 of those from worst to best (in my opinion):

Daily Mile: Cute design. It’s like Twitter (or a Facebook Group) where you can add workouts. That’s great, but I don’t need ANOTHER place to chat with “friends.” Great for runners only or people tracking their “workouts” (but not for people tracking their “training” [unless you’re a runner]). Not great for mulitsport athletes. Take a look at this screenshot:



2 main problems with this:
1. “5 months ago”? How about an actual date?
2. See the triathlon in the middle of that image? It’s labeled as a “fitness workout” (with no way to store my splits). That’s a little insulting. (But at least it got a bit smiley face! Sheesh.) You can’t add a triathlon, duathlon, or brick workout.

It’s “cutesy,” but a little unprofessional. When you enter a workout, you can give it varying degrees of a smiley face:



Trying to enter a triathlon or a duathlon nearly started the website on fire. Really. It’s like I was asking them to rearrange the stars. It’s FINE for tracking weight lifting routines, runs, etc., but it’s not for multisport athletes.

Daily Mile: Grade of D. (This is a little awkward because “Team Daily Mile” retweeted my tweet that linked to the “foam roller” post yesterday. Sorry.) Like I said, it’s fine for more casual athletes, or those that are runners only.

Training Peaks: Very professional. Many coaches like this because you can leave workouts in OTHER people’s log telling them what to do each day. Nice. You can track your equipment usage. It’s easy to get around, and easy to enter workouts (it’s all pretty intuitive). It totals your weekly mileage. Here’s a screenshot:



Some things I DON’T like about Training Peaks: The calendar (seen above) is a little “clunky” - it’s hard to glace at it and see what you’ve done recently. It’s also “tall,” so you can only see 2 weeks at a time (I like to see the whole month). It also takes a bit to load the calendar; I spent 5-9 seconds looking at this when I first logged in:


(that's the actual picture - don't sit here and wait for something to initialize)

Training Peaks: Grade of B-. It’s good for tracking workouts, mileage, and races (including multisport races), but the format didn’t quite fit for me. I wasn’t happy with the way the info is shown on the calendar. That’s just a personal preference, I know.

Buckeye Outdoors: The calendar was JUST was I was looking for, and it was super easy to add a workout. You can quickly see what you’ve done, and the little multi-colored symbols helps make it clear right away. Here’s a screenshot:



The calendar is “clean” and minimal. If you want to see more on a workout, you can scroll over it. Here I am with my mouse over the run workout on the 9th, and you can see the details of that workout on the far right:



Buckeye Outdoors really surprised me. I didn’t expect to like it THIS much. I’d never heard of it before people started recommending it, and it sounded like something for fans of Ohio State that liked to canoe (or something like that).

Buckeye Outdoors: Grade of B+. No major complaints. Tracked everything I wanted it to quite well (even intervals). It’s possible to print out “reports,” but the printout is a little awkward and not in that same calendar format.

Beginner Triathlete: I didn’t like the name; I don’t see myself as a “beginner” anymore. But I liked about everything else on their site. Here’s a screenshot from last month:



All the info is there that I want to see. Swim, bike, run, and strength workouts are all there in different colors. There are weekly totals at the end of the week, and monthly totals at the bottom. I can track my weight if I want to, and I have the power to make that invisible to other users if I’d like (you can see my weight on a few days when I weighed myself). If you want more info on a workout scroll over it, and more info will pop up. Here I am with my mouse over the 12 miler on the 16th, and you can see all my notes:



It easy to add races to your schedule, and then you can see who else is planned to do the race. (In fact, it was because I had the TC 10 Miler on my schedule last Oct that Emily [BikerGrrrl on Beginner Triathlete] knew I’d be running, and she snapped a photo of me that she sent to me.) You can read other people’s race reports if you find a race you’re thinking about doing. Here’s my race list:



At Beginner Triathlete, you can add equipment and note when you use it (Training Peaks has something like that too). I use it like most people: to track mileage on my running shoes. That info appears in your “blog” on Beginner Triathete. You can put whatever info you want in the header of your blog (I have my 2009 races listed, and I need to update it for 2010). Here’s my “blog” on BT, with a few things that I’ve noted:



A: Graph of my recent workouts by week (all run and swim right now...).
B: My “Equipment” list, showing that my main running shoes have exactly 251.55 miles on them (and 52.43 miles on my racing flats).
C: “Personal Bests” that link to my race where I set that PR.

You can add workouts much like you can at Training Peaks. And the calendar is nice and easy to use like at Buckeye Outdoors. So, for me, it’s the best of those 2 sites. But the forums are what sold me on Beginner Triathlete. The forums are SOO extensive. There is a LOT of good info in there, and it easy to add your own question. (There are forums for “triathlon talk,” “classifieds,” “strength training,” “IM specific,” state-specific forums, etc, etc, etc, and even a “cup of joe” forum for anything non-triathlon related.) Anyone can respond to any issue in any forum, so you have to take all advice with a grain of salt. But sometimes you’ll find the person responding is a 9:20 IM athlete (really, there are a few that I’ve “met” on BT, and that have offered me advice, and one of them is ALWAYS on BT).

I contacted the “owner” of BT and told him that I would be talking about what I liked about BT. I asked him what’s in the works at BT. He actually shared a special username and password with me so I could login as a beta tester and check out what’s on the way! Cool!! They’re planning to add more functions to each person’s “blog.” One of the biggest ones is a “Goals” page where you can add weight loss goals, speed goals, fitness goals, etc, and then track your way towards that. Thanks for letting me check that out, Mike!

Beginner Triathlete: Grade of A. It’s not 100% perfect, but I do really like it. And it’s possible to print out a weekly calendar with all your workout notes if you want a hard copy (similar to what Buckeye Outdoors can do, but easier to read). One downside to BT is that some of the settings take a bit to find when you first set up an account - it’s a little “clunky” and takes a moment to find what you’re looking for in the settings the first time or 2. (But entering workouts is a cinch.)

I’ve been using BT since I first checked it out in September of last year. I LOVE throwing my workouts up there ASAP after a workout - it makes me feel very accountable and it makes me want to work hard. That sounds stupid, but it’s true. It’s like some form of subconscious motivation.

Check out the sites I wrote about here, and maybe I’ll see you on BT!

Daily Mile: D. No thanks. Not for triathletes IMO.
Training Peaks: B-. Not bad. Good for working with a coach.
Buckeye Outdoors: B+. Nice calendar. Easy to use.
Beginner Triathlete: A. My site of choice.

What’s your preferred way to track your mileage? Do you use one of these methods? (And like I said at the top, I don’t mean any personal disrespect if you use one of the methods that I don’t care for as much. I hope we can still be friends.) And don't forget to check back at 2 am and 2 pm every day this week for more “Does It Work” posts. Click on the “Does It Work” tag to see all posts in this mini-series.

Read more...

Does It Work: ART

>> Wednesday, February 03, 2010

June 5th, 2008.

That was the day I first went to Dr. Folske for ART.

Here’s an excerpt from a post of mine on Friday, June 6th, 2008 as I described that first appointment:

...And then he dug into my hammy and heel. He would bend part of my body in one direction (let’s say my foot), then press his fingers along that muscle or tendon, and then force that body part in the other direction so the muscle moves across his dug-in fingers. Yummers.

It wasn’t too painful, except for a few moments. Those moments snuck up on me during our conversation: “...so when I was on the 17.5 mile RUN, MY HEEL STARTED flaring up around mile 10...” Yes, the loud talking indicates a sudden and unexpected jump in pain while the doc was doing his thang. But that really only happened twice.

I went on to write that he told me to go on a 4 miler just a day after working on me. Two days before, I was in pain 1 mile into my run. But my heel held up for the first 3.5 miles of that post-ART run, only to start to hurt a little as I was climbing the final hill towards home. Later, in that same post quoted above, I said this:

I’m pretty sure Dr. Folske is the second coming of Jesus Christ (in a completely non-blasphemous way)! He’s gotta be related to Jesus at least. Maybe he’s the second coming of Jesus’s long-lost chiropractor cousin.

Ha! I’d forgotten that I’d said that!

So what’s ART? Here’s what Dr. Folske’s website says about it:

Active Release Techniques (ART) is a patented soft tissue treatment that requires intensive training and dedication by the health care professional providing the treatment. Only a handful of practitioners in the world are certified in this procedure. For a list of providers trained in ART visit www.activerelease.com. ART is designed to locate and break down scar tissue and adhesions which cause pain, numbness, weakness, stiffness and biomechanical dysfunction associated with repetitive strain injuries (RSI).

Since June 2008, I’ve been to Dr. Folske probably about a dozen times. I saw him a lot in 2008 when I was really working through some heel issues. I only saw him a few times last year, and it’s probably been nearly 6 months since I’ve had to go in.

The thing that struck me when I first met with Dr. Folske was how fast he told me to get back out there. If you make an appointment with a “regular” medical doctor (or maybe even a PT), the first recommendation might be to take 2-4 weeks off. Dr. Folske told me to run the next day. That was surprising. He also DIDN’T say “You should make 2 appointments a week with me for the next 14 years.” Sometimes when I have an appointment, he’ll say “Go on your long run tomorrow. Let’s make an appointment for you for 3 days from now IN CASE you need it, but you can call and cancel - only come back if you think you need to.” And he also gave me special stretches and a few exercises to strengthen the weak areas that cause my problems.

ART: Grade of A. It really helps me, but I’m too cheap to always want to pay that co-pay. So the only thing keeping from being an "A+" is the price. (It’s still only $25 on our insurance, but that adds up.)

If you’re in the Twin Cities somewhere, check out Dr. Folske for all your ART needs. (I should mention that Dr. Folske is a triathlete and an Ironman himself, so he “gets it.” He knows you want to get back out there for a swim / bike / run.)

Have you had ART done to you? Was your experience as “raving” as mine? And don't forget to check back at 2 am and 2 pm every day this week for more “Does It Work” posts. Click on the “Does It Work” tag to see all posts in this mini-series.

(BTW, the next post at 2 am is going to be a very extensive review of a few different free websites where you can track your mileage, workouts, and races. Check back tomorrow morning for that!)

Read more...

Does It Work: Foam Roller

Two words: HELLS YEAH!!

If you’re new to running (or anything athletic), you could benefit from the “joys” of foam rolling. Foam rolling is a type of self massage / self pressure therapy that you can do as you use your body weight to roll up and down a cylindrical piece of hard foam. It’s meant to "work out" sore muscles.



I bought a foam roller a number of years ago to work my IT band (which is a movement much like in the photo above). It hurts. But works so well. Now I use it on my perennially sore calves. Some evenings, I spend 10 minutes foam rolling my IT band, my calves, my quads, and my hammies. I’ve even started to put it under my neck and roll my head side-to-side to help with neck tension.

“They” say to make sure to not overdo it. (I don’t know who “they” are, but I’ve heard this from many people.) Some people say to start with muscles closer to the center of the body and work your way to the outer limbs. Some people say to pause over sore areas while others say to just roll right through them (I usually roll right through). Most people say to just do 10 slow passes or so before moving on to a different spot.

You can pick up a foam roller at any “good” running store, most sports stores, and anywhere online. Some are only about a foot long. I have a bigger one:



Sometimes (as I’ve joked about before), my foam roller looks like this:



I find myself sometimes rolling up and down the “sweet spot” of my calves. I’ve learned I have to mix it up as I roll; if I stay in one area, it doesn’t do much. But if I go up and down different parts of my heel (pivoting my body a little to the left or right now and then), THEN it hurts more and is working areas that NEED to be worked.

Foam Roller: Grade of A+. I love it when I pretend to be John Mellencamp and sing “Hurts So Good” as I’m foam rolling. (No, not really...)

BTW, I came across the following image while doing a Google search on foam rollers. I don’t know what this is, but DON’T do this...


...or at least do this in the privacy of your own home...

Do you have a foam roller that you’re in love with? How do you use yours? For what “trouble spots?” And don't forget to check back at 2 am and 2 pm every day this week for more “Does It Work” posts. Click on the “Does It Work” tag to see all posts in this mini-series.

Read more...

Does It Work: Arnica Gel, Topricin, "Healing" Lotions

>> Tuesday, February 02, 2010

I have bad heels. They're always just a little sore. Sometimes they get worse. So I've tried "pain relief" creams to see if they can help. A friend recommended Traumeel to me. I couldn't find Traumeel at my local GNC, but the "dude" working there recommended Arnica Gel:



I started using it once or twice a day. It seemed to help. But I also was using it just after stretching and foam-rolling, so I don't know how much of it was the gel.

In December, I won a "Worst Race Photo" contest with the photo I took of myself with my frozen face and bloody nose after last year's Winter Carnival Half Marathon in -15 conditions. (Great contest idea, BTW!) The contest was put on by Topricin, which is a pain relief cream. Because I won, I was sent all different kinds of Topricin:


The "tubs" are their normal stuff, and the bottles are their foot cream

I posted something in a forum online regarding Topricin. I asked if anyone has used it and/or buys into their claims. A day later, I had an e-mail from the President (and Chief of Research) of Topricin, saying he'd be glad to talk about his products. I told him I was skeptical and asked for more info - specifically, who uses their product and what doctors think. Here are some excerpts of what he sent me:

Hi Steve,

Truly appreciate your response and questions. As I mentioned in my email it is important to maintain a healthy skepticism regarding products as many make marketing claims that simply are not true.

Those to endorse or use Topricin are many but here are just a few notables: Ivan Lendl, Billie Jean King, Nancy Kerrigan, Freeman McNeal, Paul Polamalu, Uta Pippig, Anthony Davis (USC fame), Mark Sanchez. In addition the Boulder Road Runners, specifically Rich Castro has trained world class runners from around the world for over 10 years using Topricin.

As to primary doctors many are NYC based, a tough environment to say the least for any product and they include: the Hospital for Special Surgery as well as the Integrative medicine program at Beth Israel (CCHH) and more. Here are excerpts of their comments:

Resolves many musculoskeletal issues especially as they relate to severe trauma and neuropathic pain.
Measurable reduction in recovery for many patients are trauma injury or post surgical trauma
Measurable reduction in the amount of pain meds used for patients
Valuable adjunct to all physical therapies
Successful in reducing the adverse reactions of both radiation and chemo as a support oncology treatment protocols

Closer to home for you Partners in Healing of Minneapolis are users of Topricin.

He goes on later to say this:

FYI: Topricin is regulated by the FDA as an OTC medicine. We have been in business for 16 years, and are very dedicated to the doctor patient relationship. The products formulary works by helping the body’s affected pain area to achieve homeostatic balance, vital for supporting and enhancing the healing process, with healing being the ultimate means of pain relief.

So unlike analgesics (topical smelly greasy hot ointments and or oral pain meds) that mask pain symptoms, Topricin was designed to ease the symptom pain by helping the body to address the cause of the pain. Helping the person have a safer and in most cases a more effective means of addressing the pain issues. The product produces no side effects, and can reduce the side effects of oral pain meds by reducing need/dependency for all classifications of oral pain meds for the individual.

I like what he's saying, but is it all true? Is that really how it works? And do those people all use it regularly?

Quick side-story: My grandpa has recently been complaining about pain in his hands. He needs to take pain-killers (which he doesn't like to have to do) before he can pitch horseshoes. And he's DANG GOOD at pitching horseshoes: he's placed first 9 out of the last 11 years (or something crazy like that) in his "old folks trailer park" where he and grandma stay for 4 months each year! Here he is teaching Pharmie how to throw a horseshoe:



And here he his measuring to see if one of my throws counts for any points:


Pretty limber for 81, isn't he?!

Anyway, to speed this story up, I sent him a few of the small packages of Topricin to see if they would help his hands. He started using it, and he could feel a difference right away. He was about to run out of the packets I sent him, so he had to save the last packet to use during a big day of bowling. He used it just before bowling, and he bowled a 214 game with a series over 500! CRAZY! So I mailed him one of the bigger tubs to use as well. He really likes the stuff!

Arnica Gel: Grade of C+. It's very "pure," so that makes me feel safer using it. But I don't know HOW much it has helped me.

Topricin: Grade of C+. I feel like it's helped me more than arnica gel, but I have to admit that I'm nervous rubbing a cream with all kinds of "stuff" in it on my body. And is it really helping my body heal itself like their president claims? Or is it just masking the symptoms? (BTW, Topricin also contains arnica gel.)

Topricin (after taking into account my Grandpa's raving endorsement): Grade of B+. My Grandpa is a no-nonsense kind of guy. If he's been seeing an improvement with his arthritic hands, then I'm pretty convinced it works. I need to try Topricin more before I make my final call of it being "OK but not stellar."

So, have you used Topricin? Arnica Gel? Traumeel? Have you found anything to help with pain, inflammation, or overuse injuries? Let us know what you've found. And don't forget to check back at 2 am and 2 pm every day this week for more “Does It Work” posts. Click on the “Does It Work” tag to see all posts in this mini-series.

Read more...

Does It Work: Aquaphor

Before January, I’d never used Aquaphor (made by Eucerin). We had a few small samples in our cupboard that we had gotten in swag-bags at local races over the years:



Last month, Pharmie and I went to AZ. (Click here for photos from that trip, and click here to see photos of us climbing and running at the Lost Dutchman State Park.) I went on a hard 9 mile run down there that left me with some nasty blisters under my big toe. I SHOULD have just popped and drained them, but instead I just ripped the blisters completely off:



Pharmie told me I needed to keep it moist. So that first night I smothered it in Aquaphor:



That really helped the situation. I applied Aquaphor twice a day - before bed and after getting up. The day after those nasty photos above, we went hiking / running in the Superstition Mountains for 5 hours, and my feet were fine. A few days later, I really smothered my blister wounds in Aquaphor before an 8 mile run, and that helped A LOT.



Aquaphor for Healing: Grade of A. I’ve had blisters like this in the past. And they usually get all dried, cracked, and nasty. And lotion is NOT NEARLY as thick as Aquaphor. (I’ve tried regular lotion, “good” lotion, Gold Bond “Triple Action” Foot Cream, Mission Foot Cream, and foot lotion from Bath and Body Works. Aquaphor is thicker and “stays put” better than any of those.)

Aquaphor for Prevention: Grade of B+. This really helped the few times I used it on my wounds before runs. I mean, it’s not magical and won’t prevent hot-spots or 100% of all annoyances, but it’s still good stuff. When using it for “prevention,” I use it a little thicker than when using it for “healing.”

So, have you used Aquaphor? What’s been your experience with it? I know some people use it in place of Body Glide in certain areas - have you done that? And check back at 2 am and 2 pm every day this week for more “Does It Work” posts. Click on the “Does It Work” tag to see all posts in this mini-series.

Read more...

Twitter

Follow steveinaspeedo on Twitter

Facebook Fan Page

All content and original images copyright 2006 - 2026 by Steve Stenzel, AKA "Steve in a Speedo." All Rights Reserved.
Want to use something seen here? Just ask - I don't bite.