This last workout was 6x200 descending with 200 jogging rest between. Initally when I was given this workout (NINE years ago), I was told to do 33, 32, 31, 30, and then the last 2 ALL OUT. I knew I couldn't hit these times now (I couldn't hit them 9 years ago either!), but the idea was to get faster.
A damp morning track.
What 400s look like when you go HARD for 200 and EASY for 200.
Pooped after the 6th one. Where are my nipples?
0:35.6
0:35.1
0:34.5
0:33.4
0:33.4
0:32.9
34.15 average
200 meter jogging rests between were 1:05, 1:02, 1:13 (got a drink), 1:02, 1:03, and 1:04
Pace and heart rate. (My heart rate HAD to have been registering wrong for the first one.)
Most of my interval work was 4:30 down to sub-4:00 pace.
(Note I ended at 3:57 pace here.)
Foot strikes: around 190 when running fast, and around 165 when running easy.
• 800s/400s: over 2 sec faster in the 800s, just 0.1 sec slower in the 400s.
• 12x200: 0.7 sec faster than 4 years ago.
• 8x400: 0.5 sec faster than 4 years ago.
• 6x200: 0.75 sec slower than 4 years ago.
I tweeted about this final track workout after it was over, and I noted that I was feeling pretty good about my sub-5:00 chances until just after that final workout. Everything was trending in the right direction until that workout. I'm just telling myself to SUFFER HARD for the race next weekend and it MIGHT be do-able! We'll see!!!!!!
(p.s. My Garmin randomly pops up during runs with my "performance condition" letting me know if my pace and heart rate are telling it I'm getting in better or worse shape. It often pops up in the opening few miles of a long run saying "+2" or "+3" which is a good thing. After this track workout, I reset my Garmin and took off for home on a cool down run. The track workout had spiked my heart rate [OBVIOUSLY] but now I was running 8:00+ pace home. So my Garmin chimed in to say my performance condition was "-9!" Ha! That's the lowest negative I've seen it give me! Thanks for that.)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for your comments! Have a great day!